Clearing up secondhand smoke and bullying in the multi-unit housing sector
Instilling a Fervent Wish for Smoke-free Housing – XXXX
January 2012: Bullying, mobbing, workplace violence, the toxic workplace, sexual and psychological harassment again make headlines in BC, and the locus of attention is government.
Think back, recall: does anyone remember the tragedy of Richard Anderson shooting three Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection employees October 15, 2001? This incident became a watershed in how BC viewed the toxic workplace, and violence between workers. It created a new sensitivity to violence in the workplace, out of which emerged the definitions outlining the behavior of workplace violence.
Definitions exist in occupational health & safety legislation in BC, Alberta, and Saskatchewan, with Quebec standardizing legislation.
A couple of weeks ago, Sam Cooper for The Province wrote on the “Elite B.C. RCMP spy unit devastated by abuse of power.”
Michael Smyth continued the dialogue focusing on the financial costs: “Bullying takes huge bite out of B.C. Economy,” and “Civil servants share their office-from-hell stories.”
Government public relations denies workplace bullying is the problem purported to be, but government employees in a private online discussion forum reveal a serious problem.
Premier Christy Clark presented herself as an anti-bullying advocate, and promised zero-tolerance on bullying – in schools. In June 2011, she announced reinstatement and expansion of an internationally recognized anti-bullying program, Roots of Empathy. Now, she promises to take decisive action.
Does Premier Clark's zero-tolerance anti-bullying stance extend to the situations I wrote about tagged under “Grandfathering Smokers?”
As destiny plays out, another news reporter, Eric Seeto from Global TV's CHBC Okanagan, picked up on a story of bullying in the subsidized non-profit housing sector connected to secondhand smoke.
Seeto reported that Christopher Housing Society in Penticton evicted Liz Bourassa (along with her two young children) for yelling at her landlord and her neighbours about secondhand smoke (and noise) coming into her childrens' bedrooms.
In fact, it was the alleged yelling as recorded on a frantic voice mail to management, and not yelling about secondhand smoke that the dispute resolution officer found to be cause of interference against the neighbours and the landlord, and granted the eviction.
In desperation at finding herself and her children homeless, Liz Bourassa went to CHBC News, and turned over to them all the documents from the dispute resolution hearing for review. Reporter Seeto asked Liz whether she harassed or bullied her neighbours? “Absolutely not,” said Liz. “I would raise my concerns, and I get hostility.”
Next door to Liz Bourassa is a family of five, all smokers, two of which are teenagers. If they each smoke one pack a day, that is 100 cigarettes. If they sleep 1/3 of the day, and are out and about or at work 1/3 of the day smoking ½ of a pack of cigarettes, then at home during after-work hours, they will each smoke ½ of a pack, and expose Liz and her children to secondhand smoke from approximately 50 cigarettes. That's pretty substantial secondhand smoke drift coming from one neighbour.
Sheilah Findlay, Portfolio Manager with BC Housing attended at the Residential Tenancy hearing in support of Christopher Housing, and therefore has first hand inside knowledge of this situation. This is contrary to BC Housing telling me that their Property Portfolio Managers have no hands-on relationship with their non-profit housing service providers and the management thereof. This is contrary to BC Housing's statement to CHBC Global News that “We have been assured that an extensive consultation took place prior to the tenancy being terminated.”
I challenge anyone interested in reading these documents which Liz Bourassa has made available, to find that yelling was the issue as opposed to secondhand smoke (or noise). Any reasonable and cognizant person reading just the documents provided by Christopher Housing Society, including the dispute resolution officer's decision, might well conclude as I do, that Liz Bourassa was targeted for daring to bring up the secondhand smoke issue repeatedly, and was deemed to be harassing smokers and management because of it. What she did was challenge Christopher Housing's management, and asked that the substantial amount of secondhand smoke be considered under Quiet Enjoyment, in the same way that the judge ruled in Lawrence vs Kaveh.
Liz also tried to get the RTB decision through for judicial review and was denied that kind of help twice.
Yes, she is angry, disgusted, and in despair. Any reasonable person would be so. Any reasonable person trying to protect her two young children would be so engaged. But Christopher Housing and Liz's tenants have contempt for her. That's a whole lot of different emotion.
Read about investigating RTB decisions
Read excerpts from Christopher Housing's eviction package
Read about Psychological Harassment and Toxic Workplaces
Liz also tried to get the RTB decision through for judicial review and was denied that kind of help twice.
Yes, she is angry, disgusted, and in despair. Any reasonable person would be so. Any reasonable person trying to protect her two young children would be so engaged. But Christopher Housing and Liz's tenants have contempt for her. That's a whole lot of different emotion.
Read about investigating RTB decisions
Read excerpts from Christopher Housing's eviction package
Read about Psychological Harassment and Toxic Workplaces